<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Basil Vandegriend: Professional Software Development &#187; business management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/tag/business-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.basilv.com/psd</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Seven Attributes of Change Leaders</title>
		<link>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2008/seven-attributes-of-change-leaders</link>
		<comments>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2008/seven-attributes-of-change-leaders#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Basil Vandegriend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2008/seven-attributes-of-change-leaders</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can organizations change? Given my interest in perpetual learning and continuous improvement, I find this an interesting question whether you are talking about a small team or an international corporation. While organizations can slowly evolve by accident, significant transformational change only happens due to focused and deliberate effort. The people responsible for championing this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can organizations change? Given my interest in <a href="http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2006/perpetual-learning">perpetual learning</a> and <a href="http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2006/continuous-improvement">continuous improvement</a>, I find this an interesting question whether you are talking about a small team or an international corporation. While organizations can slowly evolve by accident, significant transformational change only happens due to focused and deliberate effort. The people responsible for championing this effort are often called change leaders.</p>
<p>At the recent <a href="http://www.iceconference.com/">ICE Technology Conference</a> I attended a presentation by Katherine McLean, PMO Director at Deloitte Global Services, who presented seven attributes – personal characteristics – that successful change leaders must possess. While I did not agree with all of her points, I was able to identify additional characteristics from my own experience.</p>
<h3>1. Initiative</h3>
<p>A deliberate change starts with an idea or vision of a better way, or at least a belief that there is a better approach. Initiative is required to act on this belief and go beyond the status quo.</p>
<h3>2. Commitment</h3>
<p>Organizational change is almost always a lengthy process with long-term and not short-term benefits. In order for the organization to commit to this change process, you as the change leader must possess and demonstrate your commitment.</p>
<h3>3. Passion</h3>
<p>Being truly passionate about the change – your vision of the better way – will help on a number of levels. On a personal level passion will help supply you with the motivation and courage to carry through with the change. When dealing with others, if you are able to demonstrate and communicate your passion for the change, you will have a much easier time obtaining the buy-in you need.</p>
<h3>4. Motivator</h3>
<p>You need to be a self-motivator to maintain a high level of motivation concerning the change. Possessing commitment and passion for the change will help greatly with this. Perhaps more importantly is the need to motivate others to accept and sustain the change. You cannot carry out organizational change by yourself.</p>
<h3>5. Courage</h3>
<p>Significant change will often impact existing power bases and norms. There will always be people satisfied with the status quo or resistant to change in general. Courage is needed to proceed with the change despite the resistance or even active opposition to it. </p>
<h3>6. Caring</h3>
<p>Change imposed on others without regard for its impact to them will seldom last long. You need to care about how people will be impacted by the change and how they will be treated during the change process. </p>
<h3>7. Perseverance</h3>
<p>Difficulties and obstacles will arise during the change process. You need the perseverance to continue towards the end goal despite setbacks or roadblocks.</p>
<p>Organizational change is not easy, especially not for the change leader. If you are involved with or contemplating it ask yourself which attributes you possess and which you may need more of in order to attain success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2008/seven-attributes-of-change-leaders/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Silver Bullet Proof?</title>
		<link>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2007/are-you-silver-bullet-proof</link>
		<comments>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2007/are-you-silver-bullet-proof#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Basil Vandegriend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2007/are-you-silver-bullet-proof</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently attended a presentation titled "Are You Silver Bullet Proof?" at the ICE Technology Conference by Sharon Stanbury and Joni Mines of the City of Edmonton. As non-I.T. people, they revealed an interesting perspective on how enterprise I.T. departments and the business should work together. They started by introducing two myths concerning I.T.: Myth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently attended a presentation titled "Are You Silver Bullet Proof?" at the <a href="http://www.iceconference.com/">ICE Technology Conference</a> by Sharon Stanbury and Joni Mines of the City of Edmonton. As non-I.T. people, they revealed an interesting perspective on how enterprise I.T. departments and the business should  work together. They started by introducing two myths concerning I.T.:</p>
<ul>
<li>Myth #1: There is a 'magic' solution or technology that will solve all our problems.  Sharon &#038; Joni called this silver bullet thinking, which is a nod to the classic article "No Silver Bullets" by Fred Brooks, who argued that much of software developer involves essential complexity that no tool or practice can magically simplify or eliminate. Both technical and non-technical people can subscribe to this myth. Technical people should know better, but the optimists and early adopters are often suckers for the next new technology that comes along, believing that it will solve all the problems with the current approach. Good examples of this were Ruby on Rails for developing web applications, and now currently Erlang for doing concurrent processing. It is easier for non-technical business people and managers to buy into this myth because of their lack of technical knowledge, especially if the I.T. department or sales people are eagerly pitching a solution that they claim is the solution. Recently I helped out a software development team struggling with multiple parallel development activities on the same code base. They were already using branches and merging within their version control tool, so I was surprised to discover that the non-technical lead of this team was convinced that there was some feature or approach to using the version control tool that would magically make all their problems go away.
</li>
<li>Myth #2: If an I.T. project is properly managed and is successful – on time and budget – then the benefits will occur automatically. In order to be funded, most I.T. projects require a business case with a cost-benefit analysis that specifies the expected benefits from the project. Once the project is approved the business case is often forgotten about, especially by the I.T. team. The assumption is made that the benefits will occur automatically.
</li>
</ul>
<p>The typical result of believing these myths is that the I.T. project team celebrates their successful project, but the client is left unhappy or angry since the original expected benefits are not realized. To protect themselves, I.T. has adopted various practices such as expectation management, contracts, and audit trails. These help protect the I.T. team, but do not improve the customer's happiness.</p>
<p>This is a problem for the business. The solution is for the business – not I.T. - to ensure that business value is realized. I considered this a key insight of the presentation. The business owner must manage a business initiative potentially spanning multiple I.T. projects to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved. Sharon and Joni stated that in their experience it usually takes up to five years after the completion of the first I.T. project before the appropriate level of benefits are realized. This seemed like an overly long period of time to me, and I wonder if their experience being with the government rather than corporations was a factor. </p>
<p>Sharon and Joni outlined a management framework called Value Management that helps business managers determine, evaluate, and finally achieve business value for an initiative. They called it a formal discipline similar to project management. The main insights behind this process are that expected business value must be defined up front along with measurable metrics as to whether it has been achieved, and then the initiative must be regularly evaluated and adjustments made as necessary to ensure that this value is realized. Sharon and Joni presented a number of examples within the City of Edmonton where the use of Value Management resulted in positive outcomes. </p>
<p>Sharon and Joni pointed out that organizations and business managers that use this type of process are silver bullet proof: rather than believing that technology will magically solve their problems, they should instead perform a disciplined evaluation of what they want to achieve and then manage to this outcome. </p>
<p>I think this is an important lesson for those of us in I.T. Not only should we be wary of silver-bullet thinking within ourselves, but we should also be aware that delivering business value is the ultimate goal of every I.T. project. Losing sight of that risks losing happy clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.basilv.com/psd/blog/2007/are-you-silver-bullet-proof/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

